I am a member of a
few groups on the social media site, Linkedin.com. Recently, a member of the group called
"Project Manager Community" asked the following question : "Does
having a PMP state you're a better PM compared to one that doesn't have this
certification?".
So far, there are
more than 110 comments and they are still continuing to be added.
My answer was to
comment that it is not just the qualification, but that it must be combined
with experience to make a good PM. The
depth of knowledge that the PMP exam makes each candidate understand is far
superior than any other PM exam that I have seen, or indeed taken. Each candidate must know the PMBoK inside out
and understand the complexities and dependencies of project management.
However, the exam
alone does not mean you are a better project manager. A project manager must have other skills to
compliment the PMP qualification, such as communication, negotiation, team
building and visionary skills. These
skills are difficult to obtain from a book, but are usually learnt on the job,
through mentors and experience.
I have always stated
that my father installed a mantra of "Education, Education,
Education" into me. Since leaving
university I have tried to study and complete at least one exam every year. This is key for my role as a consultant, to
keep on top of the latest trends and developments, seeing as I work
predominantly in IT, which is constantly moving forward with new technologies
and techniques. The PMP candidate does
not stop their education once they have passed the exam, but they must take
ownership of their own continual education through the Personal Development
Units, which are snippets of education or Project Management roles,
presentations, mentoring and other community based activities to keep up their
qualification. This shows a level of
personal dedication and willingness to better themselves in their chosen
career.
In terms of PM
qualifications, I have been fortunate enough to take the Prince2, PMP, RMP and
MSP exams. The toughest exam so far has
been the PMP, but it was also the one I most enjoyed. The depth of knowledge gained from read the
PMBoK far outweighed the knowledge I already had from Prince2. The Prince2 exam focused on a methodology and
processes, whereas the PMP exam took to candidate through the tools and
techniques to deliver a project without the confinement of a structured,
defined workflow.
As both a candidate
and an employer, I feel that the difference between a candidate with the PMP
qualification, is that they have the overview and understanding of delivery…
which is what Project Management is all about.
A PMP is not confined to a particular methodology, a particular template
or toolset, but is a rounded Project Manager who is able to apply their trade
to any project in any corporation within any business sector. For the employer, there is a certain
"comfort level" with a candidate who has undertaken the PMP
exam. For the employee, there is the
comfort level in having a solid foundation, with a common language of Project
Management.
On a final note, I
have to confirm that just by having a PMP does not make a person a great
Project Manager. Experience matters, but
combining years of experience with a depth of knowledge and continuous learning
allows the Project Manager to be the best that they can be.
No comments:
Post a Comment